2011/8/28 Alexander Klenin <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 00:31, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Bart <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I would think moving to "Patches" (with or without unassigning) would >>> be even more indicative? >> >> I don't think this solves the confusion. A patch might be in patches >> for other reasons then you moving it there. The original reporter of a >> patch might have put it there or a developer might have moved it there >> for whatever other reason. > > In general, I think "Patches" subproject is confusing and > should be eliminated.
The idea is / was to have a special place for patches, so that they can get priority treatment, This was before Mantis supported tags, so maybe this can be handled wth tags better these days. OTOH, I would miss the possibility to have statistics for patches only. Vincent -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
