2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner <[email protected]> > Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design > packages stay as "install next time" or whatever it's called, forever. But > don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the old-fashioned way -- by > playing video games until somebody else fixes it for me :) > > Out of pure intellectual curiosity -- what is the story behind the > monolithic build? Surely fpc doesn't lack (anymore?) the requisite > .dll/ld.so features to accomodate a .bpl-style approach? > > -gmt > > ------------------------------ > > 2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner <[email protected]> > >> I am despairing after two days of trying to get svn to build itself on >> win32 (under wow64) with the fixes_2_6 branch of fpc. >> >> Is this, by any chance, in some >> known-not-working-for-now-while-somebody-hacks-on-something state? >> > > Yes, I think I am the one to blame. I simplified the Build Lazarus dialog > and the associated code. > Unfortunately it broke the build process. I will revert the changes > tomorrow unless I find the problem before soon. > > $ make all > $ lazarus.exe > should work also on Windows (more or less). > > Regards, > Juha > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > >
Could the problem have to do with the issues discussed in this thread - http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2011-October/067748.html- perhaps involving some of the other files in the build process? -- Frank Church ======================= http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
