On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:36:05AM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
> > developers would focus on tools for debugging, but follow the road map
> > and I see good things to come.
> 
> A comment in front of the deprecated won't be good, but a string behind 
> the deprecated would be nice ;) (for the reason see below)

2.6.0 must be compilable with 2.4.4.
 
So the fact that 2.6.0 compiles messages to "deprecated" (*) only has an effect 
on 2.6.2 and beyond.


(*) and in reality, the docs tool must survive it also.

--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to