On 24.02.2012 22:09, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:36:05AM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
developers would focus on tools for debugging, but follow the road map
and I see good things to come.
A comment in front of the deprecated won't be good, but a string behind
the deprecated would be nice ;) (for the reason see below)
2.6.0 must be compilable with 2.4.4.
So the fact that 2.6.0 compiles messages to "deprecated" (*) only has an effect
on 2.6.2 and beyond.
Right... I forgot about that (though one could have added a compiler
condition around the message - which does not mean that you should have
done that!)
(*) and in reality, the docs tool must survive it also.
That is indeed also important :)
Regards,
Sven
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
