On 2/28/12 2:53 PM, Juha Manninen wrote: > 2012/2/28 Everton Vieira <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > I'll try once more to tell on what i'm refering: "project > managemant of the development". All that i have to say about it is > in that. Who some day had worked with project management and has > the insight of how could be done in the open source enviroment > knows on what i'm talking about it. > > > Ok, we need more concrete plans. I promise to look carefully the > issues of project management if you have good ideas.
Another idea is for someone to summarize a lengthy exchange in a mailing list. The summary would be something along the lines of: "The idea of X has been brought up and discussed at length. There appear to be 3 options for moving forward. A would be least disruptive. B would take the most work but would produce the ideal result. C would be an alternative to B but would take the project in a whole new direction. The core team would like to pursue B but needs Y or Z to be done first. Anyone who wants to pursue C should know their efforts will be difficult to integrate in the future. See the following wiki page for our current plans in this area." A summary like to would certainly help me understand where we are on the documentation issues that have been discussed in the past week or so. The value of it is in helping everyone understand that the core team is paying attention to the issues that are brought up and that steady progress is being made (even if it only discussing an issue and placing it properly in the context of the developmental plan).
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
