On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Mattias Gaertner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:18:37 -0300 > Marcos Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:59:08 -0300 >> > Marcos Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Mattias Gaertner >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:38:03 -0300 >> >> > Marcos Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >>[...] >> >> >> I can't use "make all" because all configuration, components, etc will >> >> >> gone. >> >> > >> >> > No. Make does not delete/alter configurations. >> >> > In fact it does not even know where your configuration is. >> >> > That's why it can only build a default IDE or a default big IDE. >> >> > >> >> > When you start such a default IDE, it will read your configuration. If >> >> > you use it to build a new IDE it will install your packages. Then you >> >> > get a new IDE with your configuration and your components. >> >> > >> >> > Or you can use lazbuild to build an IDE with your components in a >> >> > console. >> >> >> >> Sorry, I think I did not understand. You're saying I should use Make >> >> to build a default IDE at the first time. After that I should use the >> >> Build command (on IDE) or lazbuild tool to recompile with my own >> >> configurations and components? >> > >> > "make clean all" is the clean way. >> >> It's recommended if I have an error, right? > > Yes. > >> We use "make clean all", get a default IDE and recompile again using >> pcp param to restart all configurations, components, etc. But I have >> to compile twice. Am I right? > > Yes. > Compiling once with the default settings and once with > your settings helps if compiling fails.
Oh right, that's I thought, thanks. I had need this "technique" when I had problems with update from SVN. >> > In 99,9% of all svn revisions it is enough to rebuild the IDE via the >> > IDE. >> >> OK. >> I compiled project ide/startlazarus.lpi and I got an error because the >> startlazarus.exe is running... of course. So, I started Lazarus >> without use startlazarus and I compiled again. Now I can see the >> splash updated. > > AFAIK startlazarus should end itself shortly after starting the IDE. > Maybe you were too quick, maybe your virus scanner was still scanning > startlazarus.exe. Hmm... OK, I did not know that. I will monitor if startlazarus end itself. Thanks. Marcos Douglas -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
