On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:26:00 +0100 Graeme Geldenhuys <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10 July 2012 18:11, Mattias Gaertner <[email protected]> wrote: > > And there is a feature request to support the new fpdoc notes. > > I don't know the state of the annotation system. > > I personally thing that is tackling the problem from the wrong end. I > definitely don't want other peoples annotations in my help documents. > Such functionality needs to be added at runtime by the docs viewer. > Just my 2c. I agree with the locality. The IDE is not a science project or critical apparatus. Annotations of the LCL docs and probably all packages in the Lazarus sources should be local. I don't understand what you mean with "that is tackling the problem from the wrong end". > > I can't help you there. > > Same for what image format to use, what installer to use, what version > > control system or what upgrade system. > > OK, then forget about me. :) What help do you use in your applications > - what help format and help editor do you use? So far my other applications never needed an extensive offline help and therefore I do not dare to give an advice. I leave this to others. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
