Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 23 July 2012 19:27, Michael Van Canneyt <[email protected]> wrote:
I use PDF for application help. Works perfectly, F1 and all. It has all

Yes, you told me that a long time ago. But I also remember you told me
that it only works in Windows. Plus the "help" is at the mercy of the
documentation writer.... by that I mean, there might not be a Index or
a Table of Content, and Searching PDF's are damn slow. And while we
are talking about slow - Acrobat Reader (installed by most users,
especially under Windows) has the longest start-up time of any PDF
reader.

Yup, still a crazy idea.  ;-)

It's not as crazy as using a pseudo-standard such as one of the MS Word or Open/Libre Office formats, or the sanitized versions which IBM et al. are pushing in their attempts to prove to various governments that they are 100% behind open standards. But I remain very concerned about the level of support- i.e. with any reader on any platform- to jump to a predefined entry point in a PDF.

And quite frankly, when looking at a fairly wide range of OSes and CPUs, Adobe's reader is better than the alternatives particularly when there's a thousand or so pages in a document (like the IBM S/390 manual I'm using to put myself to sleep at night).

From the POV of the Lazarus IDE, /the/ important thing is rapid and correct loading of a page in response to F1. If the storage format that this dictates can be easily created and exploited by user-written programs- which (with the possible exception of F1 support) is pretty much where we are with .chm- then all the better, because it means that the maximum number of people are focusing on improving performance and reliability.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to