On 03/08/12 09:43, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > HI, > > On 2 August 2012 18:38, Reinier Olislagers <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Ehmm.. I'm trying to contain myself, but WHY does Lazarus 1 and 1+ even >> support Win9x/ME anymore? > > Because not everybody feels the need to "fix" what isn't broken. Why
Lol, you owe me a new keyboard. No updates for 6 years from MS, no journalling filesystem (no ntfs). Stop talking out of your backside. I personally think it's immoral to support these operating systems. People should be forced away from them for their own good (security wise), since they obviously know no better. By supporting them, you just drag out the process. Henry -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
