On 19-8-2012 16:53, Martin wrote: > On 19/08/2012 15:30, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> On 19-8-2012 16:17, Martin wrote: > The proposed merge (picture) added a 2nd set of categories (copied from > the setup) to the option. > That means, that in the option, one and the same setting will then be > accessible via 2 different ways. That is the most confusing concept of > them all. NO. That was a quick MOCKUP, an IDEA of how things COULD look like, not my idea of how they MUST look like. Please read my initial post again, and especially my response to Juha.
After that, we got Ludo & your idea of a basic versus advanced options dialog, which would fit in very well as well. > Since the change can not be applied to the options, I see 3 ways only: > - current / difference You mean leave things a is? > - setup will be putting more on each page, become harder to use, but > looks more like options This is the way things seem to be going... > - we try to change the option to be like the setup, less settings per > page (1 or 2 maximum) . This will mean to have 10 or more times as many > pages/entries in the tree. I'd agree that wouldn't help. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
