On 19/08/2012 16:12, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
Because it hasn't been implemented
Then we can stop the entire discussion right now as it's all about
changes that haven't been implemented.
Yes,
Its discuss first, then implement (If someone volunteers)
Better, than someone writing a lot of code, just to hear, it wont be used...
Of course about the will or wont be used: I am voicing my opinion. If
other members of the development team have other opinions, they may
accept patches, that do not have my liking. That would be perfectly normal.
The easiest way to implement it (without duplicating everything) is to
filter out certain options (visible := false), and, or hide some pages
completly.
Yes, or disable (gray out) those controls so they won't be editable but
will be visible.
No they should be invisible. Or they are misleading
I am not sure, if re-grouping options into new pages, will be a good idea.
- hard to implement, unless by copy and paste
Could be.
Surely maintenance of basic+advanced must be easier than maintaining
setup+options?
Currently from a maintenance view, there is no issue. It's easy
Normal/ advanced can be based on the same code, that is used to search
for keywords. All items, just need a tag, if they are advanced.
So it may be very easy to do. With almost no extra code
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
