Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
On 2013-06-26 16:59, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
I don't see any relationship to COM here. Java has managed objects, C++
has, .NET has, so why not OPL too?
I wasn't referring to COM explicitly. But having objects being freed
when the developer didn't expect it (because that was not the behaviour
before), is what is going to cause troubles.
I don't see a chance for trouble when the object is destroyed *after*
the last usable reference disappears.
When you work with
reference counted Interfaces you know what to expect and coded
accordingly [eg: by putting checks in place, knowing how to pass
interfaces with/without incrementing/decrementing reference counts etc.].
Automatic reference counting works pretty well, doing it manually is
asking for trouble.
DoDi
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
