On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:49:48AM +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > On 16/07/2013 18:18, Henry Vermaak wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:23:10PM +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > >> On 16-7-2013 11:53, Henry Vermaak wrote: > >>> Ranting from a position of ignorance seriously dilutes your credibility > >>> in my book. > >> > >> I'm just saying the rants may be justified if mysql cannot be configured > >> to follow the RDBMS integrity norms. > >> Obviously you don't know if that is possible either, so let's give the > >> ranters the benefit of the doubt. > > > > Sigh, I thought I was clear on that. Using Graeme's example: > > So, QED: Mysql is not standards-compliant, the ranters have a point?
WTF? Graeme complained that the insert didn't fail in his example, I just showed that if you select the "traditional" sql mode, it does fail. As documented. So the ranters don't have a point, since they can set the sql mode in the configuration of the server, or even per session (as many people already do). -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
