On 17/07/2013 11:03, Henry Vermaak wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:49:48AM +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> On 16/07/2013 18:18, Henry Vermaak wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:23:10PM +0200, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >>>> On 16-7-2013 11:53, Henry Vermaak wrote: >>>>> Ranting from a position of ignorance seriously dilutes your credibility >>>>> in my book. >>>> >>>> I'm just saying the rants may be justified if mysql cannot be configured >>>> to follow the RDBMS integrity norms. >>>> Obviously you don't know if that is possible either, so let's give the >>>> ranters the benefit of the doubt. >>> >>> Sigh, I thought I was clear on that. Using Graeme's example: >> >> So, QED: Mysql is not standards-compliant, the ranters have a point? > > WTF? Graeme complained that the insert didn't fail in his example, I > just showed that if you select the "traditional" sql mode, it does fail. > As documented. So the ranters don't have a point, since they can set > the sql mode in the configuration of the server, or even per session (as > many people already do).
Sorry, misread then. However, you indicated the config can be fixed in this case. Doesn't mean it can be fixed in all cases. Regardless, I don't think prolonging this thread is very useful. Regards, Reinier -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
