Bart wrote:
On 10/1/13, Mattias Gaertner <[email protected]> wrote:
If you explain a Pascal library about networks, then you can explain
networks with pov of the library. General explanations without any
relation to a Pascal library should be replaced with
links to web pages about that topic.
My thoughts exactly.
But, who takes action (as in: ask the author to remove the page (and
explain why), and eventually remove it if the author does not
respond)?
There's always a risk that the author has created the page as the first
step to putting in something relevant, but if he doesn't make that clear
with e.g. a "work in progress" introduction or at least an explanation
in the talk page then it's at his own risk.
I'm a bit suspicious that if the author's completely unknown then it
could be some sort of scam. People who go by more than one handle should
make sure that they're cross-referenced somewhere, e.g. in the wiki's
user page.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
