On 03/10/2013 11:08, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > If the author can't be identified as a known user and won't explain his > rationale then he and his contributions should be treated as suspect- > particularly if the contribution is cut-and-paste from elsewhere.
The author is a known user in the sense that he has contributed a lot of documentation on FPC keywords and has responded on posts I and others made on his talk apge before. Have you actually looked at those wiki pages? I suspect he's trying to document things but going too far (in our eyes). > If he's not keeping an eye on the article and its talk page then I'd > suspect that he's sounding out the wiki as a potential home for link > spam or similar. I'm having to do quite a lot of manual spam filtering > at the moment, and I'm seeing quite a lot of subject lines that look > like they've come from Google Books. So a certain species of vermin is, > regrettably, getting smarter. Seems highly unlikely given the above. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
