Shouldn't the CHM files be (re)generated when a full build is made? On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Andreas Frieß <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 20.01.2015 um 17:43 schrieb John Landmesser: > >> perhaps that is the solution? >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/Lazarus%20Documentation/ >> Lazarus%201.2/ >> >> Maybe, a solution, but the files inside the download have the date > 19.06.2013 11:06. This more than one and a half year old ! For the fpc it > can be ok, but for Lazarus, i don't know. > > Am 20.01.2015 um 11:37 schrieb Andi: >> >>> I do a complete fresh installation of Lazarus >>> (lazarus-1.2.6-fpc-2.6.4-win32.exe) >>> from 20.1.2015, on a complete fresh PC. >>> I found the chm documentation in the Lazarusinstalldir/docs/chm, but the >>> files in this directory are from 24.8.2012 13:21 !! >>> >>> Is this the last documentation and correct for this build ? >>> >> > Andreas > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus >
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
