On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:20:45PM +0100, Kostas Michalopoulos wrote: > Which is why i'm asking, shouldn't those be generated automatically for > each build?
Currently the makefile for FPC docs is Unix centric. Which is somewhat clumsy for a windows build. I also think it is not necessary. The day-by-day maintenance would be much more work then it is worth IMHO. Even if I would propose automated builds, I would decouple docs and snapshot/release generation. (no snapshot generation because the docs didn't build?) But in general it is simply a symptom of not doing continuous documentation work, not procedures or whatever. It is simpler to make sure the CHMs are up to date once a release then keeping a more complete build system running on a day by day basis. p.s. Note that a good sign of seeing if the lcl.chm is any good is to see if the links from the lcl.chm to the rtl/fcl chms are working. Otherwise it is probably a test build -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
