Indeed.. It's no easy task for sure. Sven would have to implement
all features of the C++ Class that C++ supports. I'm guessing Sven is
gonna go with the basic VMT C++ support, which would probably include
virtual method overriding, am I right Sven?
- Dennis
On 2015-02-16 04:19 AM, zeljko wrote:
On 02/16/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 16.02.2015 08:35 schrieb "zeljko" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
> On 02/16/2015 08:04 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
>>
>> Am 16.02.2015 04:48 schrieb "Den" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>:
>>
>> >
>> > lol, speaking of which Sven, what's the progress report on the
C++
>> Classes? :D
>>
>> Currently not working on it. Generics and packages have higher
priority.
>> But I plan to continue it especially since the API of our
company's OS
>> is C++ based ^^
>
>
> That will be the one of the greatest features :)
Don't look forward to it too much. It will likely only work for simple
cases. E.g. once a C++ class uses operators (without providing the
functionality in other ways) it will likely break down...
I thought that it'll really work. Without ability to override virtual
methods it's unuseable for me.
z
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus