Indeed.. It's no easy task for sure. Sven would have to implement all features of the C++ Class that C++ supports. I'm guessing Sven is gonna go with the basic VMT C++ support, which would probably include virtual method overriding, am I right Sven?

- Dennis

On 2015-02-16 04:19 AM, zeljko wrote:
On 02/16/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 16.02.2015 08:35 schrieb "zeljko" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
 >
 > On 02/16/2015 08:04 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
 >>
 >> Am 16.02.2015 04:48 schrieb "Den" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
 >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>:
 >>
 >>  >
>> > lol, speaking of which Sven, what's the progress report on the C++
 >> Classes? :D
 >>
>> Currently not working on it. Generics and packages have higher priority. >> But I plan to continue it especially since the API of our company's OS
 >> is C++ based ^^
 >
 >
 > That will be the one of the greatest features :)

Don't look forward to it too much. It will likely only work for simple
cases. E.g. once a C++ class uses operators (without providing the
functionality in other ways) it will likely break down...

I thought that it'll really work. Without ability to override virtual methods it's unuseable for me.

z



--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to