Am 16.02.2015 11:19 schrieb "zeljko" <[email protected]>: > > On 02/16/2015 11:08 AM, Sven Barth wrote: >> >> Am 16.02.2015 08:35 schrieb "zeljko" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> > >> > On 02/16/2015 08:04 AM, Sven Barth wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 16.02.2015 04:48 schrieb "Den" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>: >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > lol, speaking of which Sven, what's the progress report on the C++ >> >> Classes? :D >> >> >> >> Currently not working on it. Generics and packages have higher priority. >> >> But I plan to continue it especially since the API of our company's OS >> >> is C++ based ^^ >> > >> > >> > That will be the one of the greatest features :) >> >> Don't look forward to it too much. It will likely only work for simple >> cases. E.g. once a C++ class uses operators (without providing the >> functionality in other ways) it will likely break down... > > > I thought that it'll really work. Without ability to override virtual methods it's unuseable for me.
I consider virtual methods as "simple cases" ;) After all I need them as well... What I meant in my example however are especially operators that are not supported in Pascal like "[]" or "()" or dereferenciation. Also Pascal operator overloads work differently by being static methods instead of members that can use "this"/"Self". Regards, Sven
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
