On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:31:20PM +0000, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Quite frankly I feel that the Lazarus version numbering is progressing > faster than is reasonable, and that it would be highly desirable to have > a "Long Term Support" v2.0.x or even 3.0.x which could be presented to > people outside the project as a robust version to use with FPC 3.0.x.
I don't think it is wise to commit to some golden version LTS version if there is no experience with LTS branches at all. First establish a LTS branch, and more importantly a maintainer/team for it, then talk commitment from the other teams and synchronized releasing. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
