I don't know if I understand in a correctr form, but I would like to
ask if FPC/Lazarus haven't any commitment with the language pascal
syntax. If FPC doesn't have, I would like to suggest since now that
you change the name of the tool from Free PASCAL for Free ANYTHING-ELSE.
No offense, but change a universal language syntax due to esthetic
questions sounds strange, very strange. If you consider the powerful
scaning tools available I think this matter must go to the trash can...
[ ]
Ricardo
At 10:18 14/12/2005, you wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:11:18 +0200
> Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I find that the words "function" and "procedure" causes a lot of
>>unnecessary horizontal scrolling. It also causes the actual names of
>>the methods not to align underneath each other, which makes scanning for
>>a method difficult.
>>
>>My suggestion: Why not leave out the words "function" and "procedure"
>>and instead have a different icon for each, maybe with the letters F and
>>P in the icons to help distinguish between them.
>
>
> Good idea. Will you create the icons?
>
> What about 'constructor', 'destructor', 'class function', 'class
procedure'?
and operator :)?
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
