Quoting Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:11:18 +0200
> > Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I find that the words "function" and "procedure" causes a lot of
> >>unnecessary horizontal scrolling. It also causes the actual names of
> >>the methods not to align underneath each other, which makes scanning for
> >>a method difficult.
> >>
> >>My suggestion: Why not leave out the words "function" and "procedure"
> >>and instead have a different icon for each, maybe with the letters F and
> >>P in the icons to help distinguish between them.
> >
> >
> > Good idea. Will you create the icons?
> >
> > What about 'constructor', 'destructor', 'class function', 'class
> procedure'?
>
> and operator :)?
And constants ? and records, enums and other types ? property ?
Borland for example gave 3 or 4 chars of the decleration type as indicator for
what exists on the code explorer, and also using different colors.
BTW if I remember currectly from D7, constructor and destructor appear the same
as procedures.
Icons with only one letter is really problematic as you can see ...
Ido
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
