Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
What is the security risk connecting via plain SVN with anonymous
access? I have only ever had anonymous access to Lazarus and FPC, and
always submitted patches via the mailing list. I am fine with
continuing to work that way.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 3/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in charge.
>
> Is there a problem to use SSH ? SSH is enabled.
> I could create an account that allows read-only access via svn+ssh.
>
> I'd rather not use plain svn, only as a last resort.
>
> Michael.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
