On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:55:14 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:05:48 +0100 (CET)
> > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > > It seems fpc 2.0.x have a bug: The -o switch does not override -FE.
> > > > I replaced the -FE with -FU.
> > >
> > > The behaviour for this changed in the development branch, based on
> > > discussions here on the lazarus list. The resulting behaviour should
> > > be somewhere in the mailing list archives ?
> >
> > Do you mean fpc-devel in october?
>
> Don't remember that. I do remember there was a discussion on one of the
> lists, and I patched the compiler as a result of this discussion.
>
> But october can be correct.
Here is the november mail:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:16:21 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> This is correct. Revision 1698 contains this fix.
>
> The behaviour is now:
> - If -o contains a path, it overrides any previous -FE.
> If -o does not contain a path, it leaves any -FE setting intact.
> - If -FE is specified after -o, it will override the output path.
>
> So
>
> -FEdir1 -odir2/binfile outputs in dir2
> -FEdir2 -obinfile outputs in dir2
> -odir1/binfile -FEdir2 outputs in dir2
It seems, the description is nice, but the examples demonstrates the
reality. ;)
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
