> The problem here is that people disagree on what SHOULD run the website -
> some think
> current php used is fine to power the website. Some think it should be
> powered by perl.
> Some people feel it should be done in PEAR or phpnuke. Some feel it should be
> powered by
> websnap style lazarus website engine. Some people feel it could be done in
> PSP. If you had
> someone in charge to say "listen Mr. we are paying you $400; If you want the
> $400 you
> build it the way we want based on our manager's instructions". But there are
> no structured
> rules or instructions, so no one will ever get it done - except the core
> folks when they
> have time. It's not as easy as just saying "we need people - do the work
> now". You must
> discuss WHAT must be done and you must have some structure and management.
> Otherwise it's
> just an open can of worms with 50 guys battling (talking) about WHAT engine
> should be used
> for the site. It's not as simple as opening up lazarus and having some guy
> build the
> website. WHO, which guy? How many guys? Define some structure. Learn from the
> Pascal
> language: a structured language. Not an unstructured language with weak
> typing.
I think that we all here agree on this: The one who builds it, decides.
That's even almost always true for the development itself.
If you build a new website which is better then the current one. And if
you can view that one to us, I'm sure we will switch to that version.
So, can I point to you to make clear 'which guy' is gonna make us a new
website?
Joost.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
