> Indeed, I think the idea would be a by-product just as a pdf in that
> case. A viewer would not be simple to do, but the format is simple.
> The file is actually a zip file with xml stuff files in it.
Indeed, OOo's file are quite easy to hack. It's zipped up xml - the reason it 
was chosen by the ODF as their standard is exactly that, not only is it fully 
publicly document - it is a non-binary format, and it will always be possible 
to write another unzip+xml-parsing routine. 

I wouldn't depend on OOo for reading at all - I think depending on it for 
editing help files is a minor, if anything it is a feature rather than  a bug 
as the writer is a very lovely interface for the task.
Just think a moment about what this could do - the IDE can generate the class 
description as an OOo template - the programmer fires up OOo, opens the 
template and writes the complete doc, saves the odt and done. 

A bigger factor IMHO is that OOo has way too many features, if we don't use 
writer as our viewer then we need to code a viewer to display writer files 
and it will almost by default lose formatting because nobody here feels like 
cloning the entire OOo codebase (sorry - I don't contribute to java projects 
as a matter of principle :p )
A.J.
-- 
"80% Of a hardware engineer's job is application of the uncertainty principle.
80% of a software engineer's job is pretending this isn't so."
A.J. Venter
Chief Software Architect
OpenLab International
http://www.getopenlab.com       | +27 82 726 5103 (South Africa)
http://www.silentcoder.co.za    | +55 118 162 2079 (Brazil)

_________________________________________________________________
     To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
                "unsubscribe" as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives

Reply via email to