2006/6/2, Burkhard Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[..]
> >
> > CORRECT
> > FMyString: string;
> >
> > INCORRECT
> > lpstrMyString: string;
> >
> > The exception to the Hungarian notation rule is in enumerated
> > types.
>
> If other developers agree, we should add this to the wiki page. If
> not, then deviation from this standard should be mentioned.
For variables this is ok, but for components, I also use the
"btnWhatever" notation. Especially on bigger projects, this helps a
lot.
Just my 2 cent ..
Well, I've the same opinion on this. I agree with the documents and
naming convention presented in these documents (especially the Borland
one, which I do follow since many years as best as I can). But the
addition which is in the old document I posted ([2..4] letters prefix
for components) is very usefull for code clearness - it's all about
code readability and clarity. When you can actually 'read' the code
and need no comments and searching here and there about the nature of
the control, this is a good thing.
Also my two cents.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
