On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 20:21:01 -0400
"Alexandre Leclerc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/6/2, Burkhard Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [..]
> > > >
> > > > CORRECT
> > > > FMyString: string;
> > > >
> > > > INCORRECT
> > > > lpstrMyString: string;
> > > >
> > > > The exception to the Hungarian notation rule is in enumerated
> > > > types.
> > >
> > > If other developers agree, we should add this to the wiki page. If
> > > not, then deviation from this standard should be mentioned.
> >
> > For variables this is ok, but for components, I also use the
> > "btnWhatever" notation. Especially on bigger projects, this helps a
> > lot.
> >
> > Just my 2 cent ..
>
> Well, I've the same opinion on this. I agree with the documents and
> naming convention presented in these documents (especially the Borland
> one, which I do follow since many years as best as I can). But the
> addition which is in the old document I posted ([2..4] letters prefix
> for components) is very usefull for code clearness - it's all about
> code readability and clarity. When you can actually 'read' the code
> and need no comments and searching here and there about the nature of
> the control, this is a good thing.
Why is btnOk more clear/readable than OkButton?
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
