Marco van de Voort wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 12:03:01AM +0200, Micha Nelissen wrote:
>> Carlo Kok wrote:
>>> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>>> They can be, why not ? Nothing is said about this...
>>> I'm asking, I'm curious. Though I guess a commercial package wouldn't
>>> actually be linking to the ide (gpl) but to the visual controls (gpl +
>>> exception?) it wouldn't be required to be gpl?
>> Indeed, they are derived from, and using, the visual controls which are
>> LGPL+exception, and as such they do not need to be licensed under the GPL.
> 
> Carlo is right afaik. It is shady in the current situation (at least
> from license text, not developer intention).

I don't see a problem. Everybody can link lazarus with everything he wants. So
if I make commercial components I deliever the .ppus and the .os. People using
them might compile them into their lazarus as well as they might link it against
the lcl for their program.

> 
> The negative view:
> 
> The problem  is that GPL defines larger works by linking. So
> nothwithstanding the fact that the controls derive from LGPL (+relaxations)
> they still meet the GPL code in the final Laz binary. And plugins are still
> hardlinked in.
> 
> The positive view:
> 
> - documented plugin mechanims are usually considered an exception to this
> and code not being part of the larger work, even though it meets in the
> library. The problem with this view is that usually these are realised using
> dynamical linking, while in Lazarus they are static (but supported and
> documented and it doesn't require to accept an license in the IDE before
> installing a plugin), for which I can't think of a precedent.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
>      To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>                 "unsubscribe" as the Subject
>    archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives

_________________________________________________________________
     To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
                "unsubscribe" as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives

Reply via email to