On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 05:00:07PM +0200, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> >>> exception?) it wouldn't be required to be gpl?
> >> Indeed, they are derived from, and using, the visual controls which are
> >> LGPL+exception, and as such they do not need to be licensed under the GPL.
> >
> > Carlo is right afaik. It is shady in the current situation (at least
> > from license text, not developer intention).
>
> I don't see a problem. Everybody can link lazarus with everything he
> wants. So if I make commercial components I deliever the .ppus and the
> .os. People using them might compile them into their lazarus as well as
> they might link it against the lcl for their program.
Hmm, on second thought, indeed. People don't distribute Lazarus with
commercial components linked in. The copyleft only kicks in when
distributing.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
