On 2/13/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Searching the internet it seems the XML preferred format for a empty
> element is a single tag with a '/' at the end. I guess we need to
> modify 'makeskel' then to output the correct/preferred format.
No, that defeats the purpose of makeskel.
Not sure what you mean by this? A single empty tag takes up less
space that a open/close empty tag.
The point is that the check for 'undocumented' in lazdoc checks for the
presence of a short/descr node. It should also check whether there is
actual text inside the node.
I disagree. Changing the node to the following LazDoc shows correctly
that it *isn't* documented. A single empty tag or a open/close tag on
one line works. The XSLT file I posted earlier creates single "empty"
tags and LazDoc is perfectly happy with that, saying that no
documenation as been inserted.
--------------------- BEGIN --------------------------
<!-- enumeration type Visibility: default -->
<element name="TCriteriaType">
<short/>
<descr></descr>
<seealso></seealso>
</element>
--------------------- END --------------------------
I think 'makeskel' still needs some cleanup - as well as LazDoc. Why
does 'makeskel' create some nodes with a single tag (<sometag/>) and
sometimes it creates nodes with a open/close "empty" tag? That's
inconsistent.
Also regarding LazDoc. From what I could find on the internet, though
not sure how official this is, but a whitespace characters (space,
tab, Cr, Lf) does not coun't as data in a element.
--
Graeme Geldenhuys
There's no place like S34° 03.168' E018° 49.342'
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
