Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:48:05 +0200
Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 12:40:39 +0200
"Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
TUTF8Char is declared as:
TUTF8Char = string[8];
Why not string[4]? Shouldn't all utf8 chars fit in 4 bytes?
Just curious, I saw this while implementing fpgui utf-8 char
reception system and thougth if I need this or not...
At the point it was not sure, if 4byte is really enough, because
some RFC talk about 6 bytes and some about combined chars.
IMO 4 bytes are enough and for combined chars we should define a
another type (string).
But is is still a char in the end ?
IIRC, you cannot tell in advance that one char in UTF8 is a composite
char. It will fit in 8 bytes.
Can you give an example?
Duh, then I've to read the specs again. I'll try to do somewhere this
weekend.
Marc
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
