Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 21/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
// specified the -FU switch in Other tab only.
-S2cgi -OG1 -gl -WG -vewnhi -l
-Fu/opt/lazarus/lcl/units/i386-linux/
-Fu/opt/lazarus/lcl/units/i386-linux/gtk/
-Fu/opt/lazarus/packager/units/i386-linux/
-Fu.
-FUddd
-dLCL
-dLCLgtk
So the exact *bug* is now highlighted. Lazarus is specifying the ouput
exe path with the -o switch when we didn't ask it to. The Project
Options -> Target executable was left blank and only the Unit output
directory was specified, yet Lazarus decided to specify the target
executable anyways.
The -o switch should only be set if the Project Options -> Target
executable is specified.
I agree with you, there is a bug. Even if there are tricks to go around
it, it is still a bug. I think this is what you mean.
So the matter is to ask to the developers if it could be fixed, right?
tiziano
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
