On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - compiler options aren't a part of project options? Why? Probably
> the options should be organized then in another format like some
> tools use today: a logical tree with options and on the right the
> options to change
Yes, but it would more complicated in code.
If you have question how to implement this just ask.
> - view todo list: should not be in the view menu?
Yes, I guess, all old reasons for the project menu are gone.
> - Components item is the cleanest menu
>
> - Tools: the first dialog about custom tools is to heavy and in more
> steps. Probably a list with tools in the left, and in the right the
> plain dialog of add/edit dialog. To add one new item should be in one
> step (having the option of adding or modify that command). Probably
> the tools should be on top of Custom tools, because you want to have
> minimalist step to get it.
Feel free to improve it.
> - Options:
> - probably they should be merged in a single dialog with a tree on
> the left, excluding Code tools defines editor, which from my point of
> view should be put in the View or Tools menu, it does not belong to
> the options place. But who knows!?
The codetools defines are global settings (read: independent of
projects and packages). It shows the project/package settings too, but
you can not edit them.
I got the feeling you prefer trees in general ;)
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
