On 10/28/07, Ciprian Mustiata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the all issues I've previously said are focusing on next things:
> - reduce the number of items (the rarely used items should be cleanup or
> removed or merged)
> - make all consistent (means when you go to one dialog and learn it, the all
> other similar dialogs should be the same)
Reducing the number of menu items is good, but it should not come at
the cost of reduced functionality. For me Find and Find in Files play
different roles, and merging them will just criple one of the two
functionalities.
> - exception: even seems probably strange, at least I am going to preffer one
> dialog that offers less options like: for compiler options a list of 4 items:
> Debug (default), Release, Normal and Custom and at Custom should be the
> "Compiler options", even you will have more dialogs to look at, but you will
> not always change the compiler options
That's not flexible enougth. We should have an arbitrary (>=1) number
of build modes, where each build mode is configurable.
We can provide 2 defaults for new projects: Debug and Release, but
even those should be editable so projects don't need "dead" modes
which are just there by IDE idiosincrasy
I gave some thougth to it, but I am not really sure how the layout of
such dialog would be...
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
