Joost van der Sluis ha scritto:
Op dinsdag 22-01-2008 om 15:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Graeme
Geldenhuys:
On 22/01/2008, Mattias Gärtner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
About: move from LCL to widgetset
That was the goal of lazarus from the beginning.
OK, I get that and respect the choice. I'm simply wondering (from a
personal point of view) if it's still the right way of doing things?
Considering you have years of experience with Lazarus development...
If you could do it (Lazarus LCL) over again, what would you change?
Hindsight is a awesome thing. :-)
For me: if Lazarus woudn't use native widgets, I woudn't use it. It's
one of the most important features for me.
You mean that someone is eager to see gtk1 style widgets? Or someone is
prepared to pay to get a dialog "Cancel - Retry -Abort" if something
goes wrong, instead of a dialog telling something meaningful?
Else I could also use Java, for example. for me the main issue with Java
is that it doesn't 'feel' native for most users.
Well Java is simply ugly, unless you make a lot of work on it.
Giuliano
--
Giuliano Colla
Whenever people agree with me, I always feel I must be wrong (O. Wilde)
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
