Vincent Snijders  wrote / napĂ­sal(a):
Ales Katona schreef:

2. I think lazarus should get separated into lazarus-lcl-<widgetset> packages, lazarus-ide and lazarus-tools (lazbuild and friends) with a "dummy" all-package like lazarus and a "dummy" lcl package which will simply default to per-distro widgetset (eg: qt on KDE distroes in the future, gtk2 on gnome). So if use installs "lazarus" they get dependency "lazarus-lcl" which in turn installs "lazarus-lcl-<whatever>".

In which package will be forms.ppu? It is needed by lazarus-lcl-gtk2 and lazarus-lcl-qt and lazarus-lcl is just a dummy package. I think you need a lazarus-lcl-common too. (You may thing about better names)
Yes, lazarus-lcl-common sounds good for this purpose. (what's wrong with the names? they should be descriptive I think)


I'd also propose to add the fpc package to lazarus deb repository.

Isn't this the case already? I see a lot of fpc debs here.
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/dists/lazarus-stable/universe/binary-i386/Packages
Didn't know this, but fpc still has the debs listed "just like that" in some ftp site. Perhaps we should unify this? eg: provide the repository for debianists on fpc page too.


Vincent

Ales

_________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
               "unsubscribe" as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


_________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
               "unsubscribe" as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives

Reply via email to