Ales Katona schreef:
Vincent Snijders wrote / napĂsal(a):
Ales Katona schreef:
2. I think lazarus should get separated into lazarus-lcl-<widgetset>
packages, lazarus-ide and lazarus-tools (lazbuild and friends) with a
"dummy" all-package like lazarus and a "dummy" lcl package which will
simply default to per-distro widgetset (eg: qt on KDE distroes in the
future, gtk2 on gnome). So if use installs "lazarus" they get
dependency "lazarus-lcl" which in turn installs
"lazarus-lcl-<whatever>".
In which package will be forms.ppu? It is needed by lazarus-lcl-gtk2
and lazarus-lcl-qt and lazarus-lcl is just a dummy package. I think
you need a lazarus-lcl-common too. (You may thing about better names)
Yes, lazarus-lcl-common sounds good for this purpose. (what's wrong with
the names? they should be descriptive I think)
For instance:
lazarus-lcl-comom -> just lazarus-lcl
lazarus-lcl -> lazarus-lcl-widgetset, lazarus-lcl-default-ws or
lazarus-lcl-for-dummies ;-)
Vincent
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives