Hi Marti,

I tried you suggestion and the profile seems fine:

These are the result of 9 Lab colours, converted to output profile and
back, using absolute colorimetry:

Lab in                  RGB out                 Back to Lab
10      0       0       0       17      1       12.6    0.5     -3.6
41.1    65.8    38.5    205     2       12      43.5    63.7    37.4
85.5    0.3     84.8    252     244     18      85.3    0.2     84.8
47.6    -49     28.1    17      156     24      48.2    -49.7   28.5
50      0       0       93      110     103     50      -0.3    -0.1
31      -0.7    -43.9   23      62      145     30.4    1.4     -49.7
39.9    53.4    -32.1   168     25      195     39.8    53.9    -34.2
53.1    -34     -20.6   23      176     165     53      -35     -19.7
93      1       -8.5    253     255     254     92.7    0.8     -8.7

This is nice :)

However, how do I know, from the profile, what the whitepoint and
blackpoint values really are?

OK, I just read it in the docs, I will give it a try...

And, thanks for version 1.14, it is running fine!

Greetings,
Auke




> Auke:
>
> This may be due to several reasons. I want to first check the accuracy
> of your profile to know where the problem actually is. So, the way to
> check
> the accuracy of your profile is to use absolute colorimetric. If this
> works,
> then rel. colorimetric is going to work too. But since rel. colorimetric
> implies a white point translation, there is no direct way to measure it.
>
> So, I proposed to use a transform between Lab -> printer profile because
> Lab identity is operating on D50. It is not same as using AdobeRGB as
> input profile.
>
> At that point abs. colorimetric should work. If not, the profile is not
> proper
> and you cannot obtain any further improvement.
>
>>c. I don't *wan*t to use absolute colorimetry as it changes the RGB
>> values
>>too much. For instance white (Lab 100,0,0) is trnaformed to 229,246,255.
>>If I print this, I don't get paper white anymore, yet my paper is
>> becoming
>>even more blue :(
>
> But your unprinted paper is not of Lab=(100, 0, 0) right? Try to measure
> your
> unprinted paper and feed such value to the abs. colorimetric transform. It
> should
> give you a (255, 255, 255) or something really close to that.
>
> Regards,
> Marti.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user

Reply via email to