Dear all,

I'll don't like to disturb, but I've now the problem from another view
angle :
I test this situation now on PC. Converting just sRGB to Proof RGB. And
get the same results. I send one of the profiles with this mai (I know,
not a very common thing). This conversion with this profile results in a
bright, high saturated image, if I use perceptual, rel/abs colormetric or
saturated. This does not happen with ColorSync nor ICM2.0 nor AdobeCMS.
What I saw is, that the dark of the profile is very small, looks like a
tree. But this are the givin profiles by the manufactor. How comes, that
lcms generates so wrong images with this conversion ?

I hope this someone could answer this, I donno what I should do, to get
the BPC easely now.

kind regards,

Kristian Kratzenstein

PS : This is the second mail, without the Profilefile, cause I don't know,
if this will be sort out. It was a zip file with the Profile in.
Profile was the : Pro4000 Archival Matte.icc givin by the Epson driver for
the Epson Pro 4000 printer, available in the Epson package SPro4000.plugin
in the (Apple) Library/Printers/Epson folder.

"Kristian Kratzenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Montag, 7.
November 2005 at 14:47 +0100 wrote:
>oky, maybe this could help anyone to help me :
>I'm using RGB printer profiles for proof (in this case Epson). Now I did
>try other Monitorprofiles (like sRGB) and this works.
>So there seem to be a problem with the Printerprofiles. One is selfdone,
>the other one is givin by the manufactor. Both lighten the Image, but only
>with lcms, not with ColorSync.
>Could anyone say, where my mistake is ?
>
>kind regards
>
>"Kristian Kratzenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Samstag, 5.
>November 2005 at 21:13 +0100 wrote:
>>Dear Steve,
>>
>>As I told before :
>>I do a conversion (internRGB -> Proof)
>>and (Proof -> internRGB)
>>Both RGB in this case
>>Switched BPC on and off (I understood this as a "perseptual" in only L
>>direction)
>>If I use one conversion, image brighter
>>If I both, Image much more bighter (black the same, so I do think this is
>>a gamma related problem)
>>If I convert intern -> proof -> intern in one step, image get darker.
>>Could anyone check, if maybe the Proof profile brings up the problem
>>(intern is Adobe RGB 1998) ? Or do anyone known, if CFM on MacOS X don't
>>work with in lcms (CFM and Mach-O are two different binaries (different
>>Pointer), Photoshop CS and before require CFM for Plug-ins).
>>
>>kind regards,
>>
>>Kristian Kratzenstein
>>
>>Steve Upton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Freitag, 4. November 2005 at 23:17
>>+0100 wrote:
>>>At 10:45 AM +0100 11/2/05, Kristian Kratzenstein wrote:
>>>>Dear Jan-Peter,
>>>>Dear others,
>>>>
>>>>maybe you help with this additional information: I tried to use lcms
>>>>transformation directly on the image (GWorld). I did so, and get the
>>same
>>>>bright image. Then I tried to use all three profiles in once
>>>>(intern->proof->intern) instead of two time changes (intern->proof,
>>>>proof->intern) and the image get much darker!!! than the orginal Image.
>>>
>>>I think the clue lies here: "need blackpointcompensation"
>>>
>>>Blackpoint compensation requires the knowledge of the source space's
>>>darkest black and the destination space's darkest black. If you split
>the
>>>transformation into two conversions then they both use Lab as the
>>>comparison point rather than the other profile... does this make sense?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Steve Upton
>>>
>>>________________________________________________________________________
>>>o  Steve Upton              CHROMiX        www.chromix.com
>>>o   (hueman)                               866.CHROMiX
>>>________________________________________________________________________
>>>-- 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>>>Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
>>>Download
>>>it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
>>>Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Lcms-user mailing list
>>>Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--------------------------------------------
>>Kristian Kratzenstein
>>Gettorf
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>--------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>>Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
>>Download
>>it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
>>Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
>>_______________________________________________
>>Lcms-user mailing list
>>Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
>>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------
>Kristian Kratzenstein
>Gettorf
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>--------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
>Download
>it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
>Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
>_______________________________________________
>Lcms-user mailing list
>Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
>



--------------------------------------------
Kristian Kratzenstein
Gettorf

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user

Reply via email to