Kia ora Frédéric, I've seen, that you have changed the license of the code from the LGPL to the CeCILL license.
What are the implications of that? How does that license compare? It sates on the web page, that it is a GPL compatible license. But is it more or less restrictive? What license is it more comparable with? Is it less restrictive, like the LGPL or even an MIT/BSD license so it can be incorporated in commercial or closed source projects? Or is it as "protective" to the open as the GPL? Guy -- Guy K. Kloss Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences Te Kura Putaiao o Mohiohio me Pangarau Room 2.63, Quad Block A Building Massey University, Auckland, Albany Private Bag 102 904, North Shore Mail Centre voice: +64 9 414-0800 ext. 9585 fax: +64 9 441-8181 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.massey.ac.nz/~gkloss/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
