On samedi 23 février 2008, Guy K. Kloss wrote: > Kia ora Frédéric,
Bonjour, > I've seen, that you have changed the license of the code from the LGPL > to the CeCILL license. > > What are the implications of that? How does that license compare? It > sates on the web page, that it is a GPL compatible license. But is it > more or less restrictive? What license is it more comparable with? Is it > less restrictive, like the LGPL or even an MIT/BSD license so it can be > incorporated in commercial or closed source projects? Or is it as > "protective" to the open as the GPL? CeCILL license is really close to Gnu/GPL, with same goals, but is adapated to french laws (they added some explicit art., missing in the Gnu/GPL, which makes it useless in france). It is a "protective" license, like Gnu/GPL. (note that there is another CeCILL license, the CeCILL-B, which is a BSD-like license). -- Frédéric http://www.gbiloba.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
