Am 11.06.08, 21:50 -0700 schrieb Mike Russell:

> I would recommend converting everything to 8 bit sRGB and sending that to 
> the printer as either tiff or high quality jpeg, whichever is convenient, 
> with the sRGB profile embedded.
> 
> There are fewer mistakes to be made when using an sRGB file, and the gamut 
> size is more than adequate for printing photographs.
> 
> Mike Russell  - www.curvemeister.com

Just for the record,

Generally 8-bit sRGB can easily render a disadvantage for printing. The 
intersection of typical Cmyk prints, read desktop as well as mass 
printing, and sRGB is rather small.
The two original mentioned devices are claimed higher quality.

With the contraints of the original questioner, sRGB might fit his trade 
off. Normally rendering is done in a larger colour space (ECI RGB) in 
higher bit depth. And at the very end of colour manipulations, the final 
result can be converted to, what fits to end devices and bandwith. 


kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
-- 
developing for colour management 
www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user

Reply via email to