Jon Roberts wrote:
You're describing a particular design issue. I personally never reflect
organizational structure explicitly with the DIT. This is precisely why.
Based on what you say I can understand the design may not be within your
control, yet not every implementation will suffer that constraint.
Hi,
Note that I am talking about naming contexts, not DIT structure.
It is common practice for companies to use e.g. dc=bigcorp,dc=com,
when their name is Bigcorp, Inc.
When they get bought by Biggercorp, Inc, Biggercorp naturally wants to
change the naming context to dc=biggercorp,dc=com.
This is the unfortunately too-frequently occurring situation which I
am trying to describe.
BR,
Mike
--
http://www.netauth.com - LDAP Directory Consulting
---
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the
SUBJECT of the message.
