> > Hi, all.  I'm just starting out with LDAP, so before I even start with
> > the technical details of my project (which is to make an address-book
> > system suitable for use with Mozilla Thunderbird and (if possible)
> > Outlook and Outlook Express, I'm trying to figure out just how to
> > organize my data.
> This reply is a bit general since I don't know either Thunderbird or
> Outlook except from some brief tests.  But anyway...

I've done a presentation on LDAP and the various mail clients.
http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com/system/files?file=LDAP105.sxi

> Read up on LDAP first, if you haven't already.  This sounds complicated
> enough that you ought to understand well what you are doing.

It is more than complicated, it is a nightmare;  the clients are all
over the map.

> On the other hand, Active Directory is a sort-of LDAP server and more,
> which doesn't quite follow the LDAP standard and can give non-Microsoft
> clients like Thunderbird trouble.

While LDAP may be the obvious technology to solve the 'White pages'
issue;  the state of application support and utter lack of standards
immensely diminishes the value of an 'LDAP solution'.

But there is a standard for contacts and contact information: vCard

If you want a solution to this problem I think a proper groupware server
is the real solution: M$-Exchange, Open Exchange, OpenGroupware, etc...

> You could define several new attributes - workMail, homeMail, etc and
> stuff them into a single entry.  But then you are limited to clients
> where you can configure which attributes they'll take the mail address
> from.  Don't know if Thunderbird can, but my impression is that mail
> clients do not tend to have a very configurable LDAP setup.

Nope.

> > But if I do that, how can I avoid having to duplicate all the OTHER
> > data about John Doe (address, city, state, etc.) that I want to keep
> > in a single record?  Can I define a "family" record that has the whole
> > Doe family's info, then a separate "stub" record that has only their
> > e-mail addresses, which can somehow be tied back to the Doe family's
> > main record?
> You can make an LDAP tree (each 'dn:' line starts a new entry):

Which no existing client will support.  You end up creating an entire
application; for a problem for which solutions already exist.


---
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the 
SUBJECT of the message.

Reply via email to