Ed,

Those are excellent links that I think would be useful for many in
this group.  Would you mind posting those to the wiki?  I think that
will encourage more of the MLS/clerk questions to go to better places.
(I don't mind them here - there are many qualified individuals and it
has been interesting to hear the shared knowledge.  It seems though
that those links might provide even more useful information for those
seeking help.)

Jesse

On 1/14/06, Ed Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See the official link:
>    http://mls.lds.org/
> Also, for MLS related discussions, the better
> list to subscribe to for ongoing dialog is:
>    http://www.MormonsToday.com/ldsclerks/
> This is where clerks discuss such problems, etc.
>
> There are precious few development resources supporting
> MLS and the pressure on them is great, so unless it is
> painful to CHQ, "priorities" delay resolving a many items.
> I've reported things like the stake's view of membership is
> inaccurate relative to what the units have, even after forced
> syncs from both sides.  The problem remains broken even a year
> after submitting the problem report.
>
> As I tell folks
> "... it is what it is, and it is better than it was, so be grateful ..."
>    Ed
>
> P.S.  Fully concur with the concern about exporting all the MLS
> data for Emergency Preparedness.  MLS has native support for such
> and (for the most part) it automatically feeds the stake the info
> via secure channels.  I'd recommend you investigate that avenue.
> Again, "ldsclerks" has a better audience for that discussion.
>
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Message: 1
> >Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:04:26 -0800 (PST)
> >From: "Greg Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: [Ldsoss] MLS/LUWS Bugs and Feature Requests
> >
> >Hi All-
> >
> >Is there a good place to send these?  Our unit has been sending them to
> >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (with the blessing of our Stake Admin).  Honestly,
> >it feels like a black hole.  Is there a better course of action?  Does HQ
> >have a system for receiving and processing user reported bugs and
> >feedback?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >-Greg
> >
> >------------------------------
> >Message: 2
> >Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:08:00 -0600
> >From: "Neeland, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: [Ldsoss] MLS/LUWS Bugs and Feature Requests
> >
> >And bugs a plenty there are.  We are on v2.3.2 and it got worse.  I've
> >got newborns getting assigned to the Young Single Adults Sunday School
> >class (I guess that's sort of accurate) and several $100,000 extra
> >getting reported in a budget area if you print it by previous month.
> >Hopefully your issues and those others submitted get addressed soon.
> >
> >Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ldsoss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
>


--

#!/usr/bin/perl
$^=q;@!>~|{>krw>yn{u<$$<Sn||n<|}j=<$$<Yn{u<Qjltn{ > 0gFzD gD, 00Fz,
0,,( 0hF 0g)F/=, 0> "L$/GEIFewe{,$/ 0C$~> "@=,m,|,(e 0.), 01,pnn,y{
rw} >;,$0=q,$,,($_=$^)=~y,$/ C-~><@=\n\r,-~$:-u/
#y,d,s,(\$.),$1,gee,print
_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss

Reply via email to