Hi there,

While it is interesting to debate this I don't think this forum was meant
for this.
If we are talking about furthering Open Source among LDS developers I think
we need
to respect the charter of this mailinglist. So please take this offlist and
discuss
this somewhere else. 

Kind regards,
Manfred Riem
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.manorrock.org/
Founding Java Champion 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Willden
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 7:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ldsoss] Boy Scouts get a "Respect Copyrights" activity badge

On Tuesday 24 October 2006 05:38, Steven McCown wrote:
> Even if you think that it *should* be okay to illegally download music 
> and videos, at the moment it is not.

At this moment it's also illegal to watch legally-purchased DVDs on Linux.
Or to rip them and store them on a MythTV video jukebox for more convenient
watching (and so that your two year-old doesn't destroy them).  For that
matter, by the letter of the law it's arguably illegal to convert your CDs
to MP3s for listening on your iPod.

This subject needs a more nuanced treatment than simply "obey the law".
Laws can be and often are wrong.  There are many examples throughout history
of laws that were horribly immoral.  The requirement that laws be obeyed
implicitly assumes that the laws are righteous -- it's just another example
of the principle of righteous dominion.  We are commanded by the Lord to
follow the guidance of the leaders placed over us (fathers, husbands,
bishops, etc.), but their right to command is contingent upon their
righteousness.  Unrighteous commands need not, and *should* not be obeyed.

In this case, I think it's clear that downloading music and movies rather
than paying for them is wrong, but I think the media cartels are also doing
evil -- arguably the greater evil.  And I think the biggest problem with
this notion of an anti-piracy patch for boy scouts is that its requirements
are entirely one-sided.  I would have no objection to an official BSA badge
of some sort that required the scout to understand both sides of copyright
law. 
It should cover not only the exclusive rights granted to the holder, but
also the exemptions built into the system (Fair Use, doctrine of first sale,
etc.), and, further, the rationale and social contract underylying the
notion of copyright.

Such a badge would help them obtain respect for copyright law and what it's
supposed to do, which would deter piracy, and would equip them to discuss
whether or not current law actually fulfills those goals.

That would be of value to scouts.  As presently defined, the patch is of
negative value.  It's propaganda, not education.

        Shawn.
_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss

_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss

Reply via email to