On Monday 02 April 2007 20:06, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I wonder how those involved in that article would feel about splitting
> the article into primary vs. secondary information.
I think that's an excellent idea, and would probably be very well-received by
those who are interested in NPOV and clear exposition of the known facts.
Those whose agenda is to confuse wouldn't like it, but they'd have a hard
time arguing against it.
Shawn.
_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
