On 4/3/07, Shawn Willden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that's an excellent idea, and would probably be very well-received by
those who are interested in NPOV and clear exposition of the known facts.
Those whose agenda is to confuse wouldn't like it, but they'd have a hard
time arguing against it.
Shawn.
This would be a great use for the LDSOSS wiki - specify topics on
wikipedia that need to be worked on, and who is watching them and
volunteering to work on them. As new topics are discovered we can add
them to the LDSOSS wiki.
Again, I want to specify (since this is archived), we still need to
remain objective. It's important that *all* references are specified,
not just one side of the story. I really like the way fairwiki does
it - while still a little biased towards our faith, they state the
issues argued against us, and what sources those issues are based on,
and then the sources stating otherwise or supporting the Church's
opinion (or facts). IMO, wikipedia should be just as informative on
both sides of the fence as fairwiki, if not more.
Jesse
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
$^=q;@!>~|{>krw>yn{u<$$<Sn||n<|}j=<$$<Yn{u<Qjltn{ > 0gFzD gD, 00Fz,
0,,( 0hF 0g)F/=, 0> "L$/GEIFewe{,$/ 0C$~> "@=,m,|,(e 0.), 01,pnn,y{
rw} >;,$0=q,$,,($_=$^)=~y,$/ C-~><@=\n\r,-~$:-u/
#y,d,s,(\$.),$1,gee,print
_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
